CHP IS DAILED

21/05/2013 | Doç. Dr. Ahmet TAN | 371


Among the existing political parties, the political party with the strongest institutional infrastructure is indisputably the CHP.

He had a say in different periods of Turkey.

Democracy has done its part for the development of our culture.

It has been the victim of revolutions and military coups in different periods.

It was closed in certain periods by the courts.

Although it had a very bright period, it could not achieve the desired success, especially after the 1980s.

In fact, in the 18 April 1999 General Elections, he was caught in the election threshold and could not even enter the Grand National Assembly of Turkey.

When we come to 2013, unfortunately, we do not have very good data regarding the future of CHP.

Why did the CHP, which has such a strong history, fall into this situation?

There are many reasons for this.

To put it very briefly, in the last 10 years, a very strong Ak Party has emerged against it!

AK Party; It did not give much opportunity to other political parties, especially the CHP.

AK Party; using many of the political arguments used by other parties, leaving them nothing to say.

The AK Party has been victorious in all of the elections it has entered.

in politics

It is voter support that determines power.

In particular, the CHP was helpless in producing alternative policies in the face of this power of the AK Party, and was insufficient in producing convincing policies to increase voter support.

The public could not break the perception that the CHP opposes everything.

He gained the dislike of the voters by constantly making negative policies.

He failed to see the fact that political marketing practices had to be filled in as the voters desired in order to influence voter preferences.

Political marketing brings success when it is used in accordance with its principles and methods with all its elements.

Today's voter preferences are very different.

Voter preferences should be read well.

During the process of making a new constitution, the government's policies regarding Syria, the government's process of ending terrorism, and the government's discussion of some basic laws that determine the future of the country, the CHP has made insufficient or timing errors in producing policies that can be accepted in displaying the attitudes and discourses desired by the electorate.

In other words, CHP could not show sufficient reflexes in updating itself.

Even when you don't show the right reflexes, the voters keep their distance from your policies.

The situation that CHP Chairman Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu had with Swoboda, President of the Socialist Group of the European Parliament during his last European visit, shows that the CHP is very confused.

It was another bad luck for Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu that this event coincided with the visit of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, which was accepted by the protocol applied to the heads of state in the USA.

This event will be discussed within the CHP, it should be discussed.

The summary of the word is: CHP should “pull” itself.

Discourses, policies, methods of influencing voter preferences, opposition strategies, kitchen R&D studies, party showcase require revision.

CHP has this power and culture.

CHP; I shouldn't make a policy about how I can keep CHP members in my hands!

CHP; How can I convince the AK Party, MHP, BDP, and independent voters, and they should make a policy, so that I can become a CHP member!

Is this easy?

In its current state, I think it is very difficult.

  •  
  • >