Such is human sociology, human psychology.
You don't know when and how to react.
Sometimes it gives an unexpected negative reaction to something you think you're doing right, and it's giving a positive reaction to something you're doing wrong.
When politics are involved, such issues become much more sensitive.
It's easy to say, you will do something for the country by overcoming all kinds of difficulties for exactly 13 years, but those people will leave you aside when you will be needed most.
Maybe it was too heavy, but unfortunately this is the view that emerged.
We made a very interesting choice.
On the one hand, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's descent into the field like a political party leader, on the other hand, the efforts of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu could not save the white party.
Maybe such a decision was taken as a party policy, but political sociology, political epistimology, and human sociology were neglected.
Bediuzzaman has a very good rule regarding social life.
"Do not open a door in criticism".
The AK Party has not given a very good test in this regard, especially in recent times.
An extreme camp has been created in the society.
Such a camp emerged that people who could not be imagined to come together came together.
Unfortunately, it has been forgotten that those who fall into the sea can hug a snake.
Corruption discussions were not taken seriously.
Legislation on political parties and the electoral system was neglected.
Rather than leaving this issue to other opposition parties, he should have arranged it himself.
If the dam had been lowered to five or seven percent, these issues would not have been discussed today.
Candidate choices caused unrest in many provinces and this situation negatively affected the motivation of party organizations.
As a party, they are very worn out, as politicians, their faces are very old.
Contrary to the previous elections, they gave the impression that they were following other political parties.
The polemic between Bülent Arınç and Melih Gökçek, as well as Bülent Arınç's untimely and critical statements about the President, negatively affected voter preferences.
Adequate policies have not been produced to satisfy the voters who have supported him so far.
Discipline and control of government spending in the eyes of society was lost.
The President's rhetoric "There is no Kurdish problem" caused an emotional break with Kurdish citizens.
Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek's "cookie" statement was not correct in terms of political communication.
A remarkable discourse or a convincing program has not been developed for voters under the age of thirty.
Longer reasons can be written.
Now the white party is faced with a new situation.
The one who will best account for this is the white party itself.
There are many lessons to be learned from these results.
In order for the achievements of thirteen years not to be a waste, it is necessary to think with common sense and draw a new road map.
The resulting photo makes this inevitable.
One thing should also be noted here.
The first party of this election is again the white party.
There is a difference of 16 points between them and the party that came second in the election.
It is the only party to elect deputies in 77 provinces of Turkey.
It is the only party that is still Turkey's hope.
The white party needs to read them correctly, too.
We will witness very colorful discussions in the coming days.
Our hope is that all our political parties entering the Parliament act with common sense.
Our geography is going through very sensitive periods.
Everyone needs to be very careful.
MHP, which increased its votes

http://aufweg.de/blogs/pharmacy/index.html%3Fp=55.htmlbuy cheap kamagra online
Finally, I congratulate HDP, who has passed the threshold and entered the parliament.
I will analyze these two parties in another article.
Have a nice week.
(June 8, 2015)